Ultra-Feminist Founder Of Femen Brazil Declares Herself Pro-Life, Apologizes To Christians

Featured Image

via Life Site News:

Sara Fernanda Giromin first made herself known to Brazil and to the world under the alias “Sara Winter” in 2012, when she became the founding member of Femen Brazil, and led a trio of girls in a number of topless protests that garnered much media attention. However, only three years later, the young activist has done an about-face and has declared war on feminism and abortion, and is apologizing to Christians for her offensive behavior. She has also published a short book detailing the abuse and disappointment she suffered at the hands of fellow feminists.

Giromin’s changing attitudes were first revealed in October of this year, when she expressed her repentance for an abortion that took the life of her first child, and acknowledged that the recent birth of her second child had changed her attitudes regarding the right to life.

“I have repented of having had an abortion and today I ask for forgiveness,” wrote Giromin. “Yesterday marked one month after the birth of my baby and my life has taken on a new meaning. I’m writing this while he sleeps serenely on my lap. It is the greatest sensation in the world.”

“Please, women who are desperate to abort, think carefully about it. I was very sorry I did it. I don’t want the same for you,” she added.

In the months that have followed, Giromin has revealed to her readership her disillusionment with feminism and gender ideology, and has repudiated her “bisexual” orientation. She has also expressed remorse for having offended Christians in January of 2014, when she engaged in a well publicized same-sex kiss with another seminude girl with a cross in the background, in front of the Church of Our Lady of Candelária in Rio de Janeiro. The photo of the two had become iconic in Brazil of homosexual contempt for Christianity.

“Asking for forgiveness is certainly not an easy thing to do,” said Giromin in a YouTube video entitled “I ask Christians for forgiveness for feminist protest.” “We went way too far and ended up offending many religious and non-religious people,” she added, recognizing the stunt as a form of “blasphemy.” She adds that she is making progress in her own spiritual life, although the exact nature of her current beliefs remains unclear.

[. . .]

Read more at Life Site News. . . .


Female Firefighter Wendy Tapia To Get Seventh Chance To Pass FDNY Physical Test

Wendy Tapia, 34, was allowed to conditionally graduate from the FDNY's Randall's Island training academy in May 2013 - despite failing the required running test

via the Daily Mail:

A female firefighter who has repeatedly failed the fitness test is being given an unprecedented seventh try.

Wendy Tapia, 34, was allowed to conditionally graduate from the FDNY’s Randall’s Island training academy in May 2013 – despite failing the required running test, New York Post reports.

Typically firefighters who fail the exam at the end of academy training don’t graduate and are forced to re-take the entire course in the next academy class.

But Tapia, blaming a foot injury for her failure, was allowed to take it again not once, but five more times over the next six months.

Each time, she failed to run the 1.5 miles in 12 minutes without gear, as required by the academy.

After failing her sixth attempt in November 2013 – without ever working an active duty shift at her assigned Engine No. 316 in East Elmhurst, Queens – she finally quit.

Now Tapia is being given yet another chance to join the Fire Department of New York with a seventh run at the test.

And this time she is sure to pass, claim fellow firefighters.

Read more at the Daily Mail.

Andrew Anglin – Masculinity and Civilization


On the surface, Andrew Anglin shows a somewhat shallow, primitive, and hateful anti-Semitism at his site, the Daily Stormer.  However, I like his site because it’s honest, because it’s often funny, because it puts out real news with no B.S. faster than the mainstream news, and because Anglin sometimes produces some thoughtful gems like this article:

My goal in addressing feminism, as you have perhaps ascertained (or perhaps not), is to encourage male readers to develop a masculine identity. In my view, the biggest reason why an individual would fail to develop a masculine identity would be that he has been socially-engineered by the sociological problem of Jew feminism. As such, that is the primary concern which needs addressed.

Once one develops a masculine identity, he then has power, personally, which he can use however he wishes. Ideally, he will use it for getting married and having kids, serving as a pillar of the community. Instead of just getting a bunch of chicks.

A Brief History of Men and Women

As I have often said, my view on women is exactly the same as everyone in history before the various cultural revolutions in the West.

Throughout history, up until the Jew-driven feminist revolution, male-female relations followed a very clear pattern. Women were generally given over in marriage to a man by their fathers. In White society, the woman’s opinion on these matters was of course considered. It does not appear to have been normal for a father to force his daughter into an unwanted marriage. Because why would he do that to his own daughter.

There was nothing nasty or mean about any of this.

Once married, the girl would then be a wife and mother. Nothing more or less, generally.

Typically, women were very happy with this arrangement, as were men. Certainly, both were a lot more happy than they are now, though studies in general happiness show that female happiness has dropped more than male happiness over the last decades when this Jewing seriously intensified.

[. . .]

Right now, the women are deeply dissatisfied with the present state of matters, mostly on a subconscious level, and crave a return to the natural balance. That natural balance involves a society which is wholly dominated by men, as it always was at every point in history, and where they are allowed to be protected, to be innocent of worldly matters, and to bear and raise children unmolested.

Obviously, Islam offers this. And that is why they support this invasion. Whether you want to frame it as sexual is up to you, but it is most certainly reproductive. Right now women have been put in a situation wherein reproducing in peace is nigh impossible, given that they are forced to deal with the male world directly.

And everything is about reproduction. Everything. The whole of the being of any living thing is geared toward this act.

Feminism gets more and more extreme, and what this is women, collectively, pushing men further and further, trying to get them to act like men and put them in their place. Women engage in provocations of men to force men to prove themselves, constantly. Men are supposed to be able to recognize this, and respond accordingly.

Yet men continue to pander to them, on the whole.

So they are opting for plan b, which is Islamification.

The proof of this is simple: feminists refuse to address abuses by Islamic men in Western societies, while continuing to claim White men are involved in a conspiracy against them. Even still, they are calling for a mass invasion by these men who are the exact opposite of the docile and cuckolded man-children they claim to view as the ideal male.

They are lying to you, bro.

Women are known for this.

Maybe it’s time to act like an adult and take responsibility for what’s happening around you?

Read more at the Daily Stormer.

The Obvious: ‘Fastest, most fit, most physical, most lethal’ soldier is ‘a man’


What should be obvious differences between the sexes, differences that only the wildest cranks would have doubted just a few generations ago, are no longer obvious.

The differences must be explained to the increasingly delusional and insulated sociopaths who comprise our population. Yet any attempt to point out the obvious only produces mindless accusations of blasphemy and hatred.

I can only pray that the restoration of reality will be as merciful as possible. But the restoration is inevitable in some form or other.

The chief of a military-focused think tank is calling on Congress to step into the fight over women in combat before “irreparable damage” is done to America’s all-volunteer military.

The call for action came on Tuesday from Elaine Donnelly, the chief of the Center for Military Readiness, in conjunction with the release of the group’s newest report on what the military has found out about women in combat.

That data, the organization confirmed, revealed the Marines have documented evidence that women are different from men.

In ways that matter to the Marines.

Donnelly’s report included a statement from the Facebook page of a “highly decorated Marine combat veteran and non-commissioned officer who participated in the 2015 Ground Combat Element Integrated Task Force.”

“This was as stacked a unit could get with the best Marines to give it a 100 percent success rate if we possibly could. End result? … [The data showed women] are slower on all accounts in almost every technical and tactical aspect and physically weaker in every aspect across the range of military operations …”

The statement continued, “Make no mistake. In this realm, you want your fastest, most fit, most physical and most lethal person you can possibly put on the battlefield to overwhelm the enemy’s ability to counter what you are throwing at them and in every test case, that person has turned out to be a man.

“There is nothing gender biased about this; it is what it is.”

Donnelly’s report came amidst the presidency-long strategy by the Obama administration to not only open the U.S. military to homosexuality and transgenderism, but advance the role of women in the military to the point they are routinely assigned to tip-of-the-spear attack groups that confront enemies – and destroy them.

[. . .]

Read more at WND.com

Five Girls Want To Become First Female Boy Scouts

The Boy Scouts of America

They’re courageously tearing down every social boundary, aren’t they? And these young girls came up with this idea all by themselves, without any prompting from outside I suppose.

Why not let grown men join the Girl Scouts, while we’re tearing down walls?

Five girls in California are attempting to break down a barrier that has stood for more than a century, by joining the Boy Scouts of America.

The girls, ranging in age from 10 to 13, formed an alternate scouting group called the Unicorns after becoming bored with the activities offered by their local Girl Scouts troop, like selling cookies and writing letters.

What they really want, however, is to join the Boy Scouts. They turned up to a meeting of regional Boy Scout leadership earlier this month in makeshift uniforms, complete with red felt vests, and presented their membership applications one-by-one.

Read more at the Telegraph.

American Girl Magazine Features Photo of Family with Two Dads

American Girl magazine has always had a subdued feminist undertone despite a conservative aesthetic, as have their extremely overpriced dolls. I’m not surprised at this nonsense.

American Girl magazine, which is beloved by many young girls, recently came under fire for including a picture of a family with two dads.

The Christian Examiner reports that One Million Moms (OMM), a group which is part of the American Family Association, is boycotting American Girl because of its decision to include the photo in their magazine.

“American Girl is attempting to desensitize our youth by featuring a family with two dads,” OMM asserts. “If your child has not seen this yet, then be careful she is not exposed and can avoid a premature conversation she is far too young to understand.”

The photo is part of an article called “Forever Family” in the Nov./Dec. issue of the magazine. It shows an 11-year-old girl who is pictured along with her three siblings and “Daddy” and “Dada.” The two gay men in the photo adopted the four children.

G.W. Thielman – How To Fix Conservatives’ Single Women Problem


Thielman makes way too much out of the human sex ratio here, where females outnumber men in the U.S. only very slightly. Nevertheless, there is no question that there is a concerted and increasingly successful effort to impose matriarchy here.

What are conservatives to do in order to keep winning elections? Thielman proposes that the best way to win over the government-dependent single woman class is to pander to them even more than the Left does.

I found this article tough to wade through.  Too many trees and not enough forest.  It does make one think though, however, even if I disagree with much of the premise and the conclusions.

Second, societies with low sex ratios, or many more women than men, alter men’s mating strategies away from aggressive acquisition for long-term commitment towards more casual sexual encounters. With men less motivated to offer access to the wealth they’ve accumulated in exchange for erotic favors, women—in order to gain access to resources for sustenance and comfort—must either rival each other for prospective husbands, or gain independent livelihood. [. . .]

[. . .] In 1902, Vladimir Lenin published a pamphlet to advocate creating a political party as a vanguard to revolution. It was titled “Chto delat’?,” usually translated as “What is to be done?” That is the question for the NISAs of our time. Without coaxing the proverbial Julia away from Uncle Sugar Daddy, conservatives and libertarians cannot hope to persuade enough voters towards restoring our economic fortunes or the rule of law in this generation. Given the electorate’s inexorable despondency, our best options depend on finding answers to the Julia dilemma.

Two suggestions are offered. First, we should voluntarily assist these single mothers through charities and other private agencies. Second, because such women lack the knowledge to ground philosophical principles, we ought to convey stories about the adverse effects of intrusive government.

Read more at the Federalist

  • July 2018
    S M T W T F S
    « Dec    
%d bloggers like this: